It is obvious: The resentment begins to stir. The German may historically tend to be "obedience to authority" - which had fatal consequences - but all he can be unlimited and not like.
a banking crisis in which the money supply fully was turned on (with the money of the people, we should finally do not forget) and looked on while shrugging his shoulders was as some of the largest employers in the country to the verge of or have slipped into bankruptcy a real estate crisis was followed in the course of which so far as the "most secure form of investment "prestigious property suddenly became a shop keeper.
people have a lifetime working hard for it, often give up so many things had to be putting aside reserves in the form of a flat, were suddenly exposed to a situation where was no longer get hold of these reserves.
important thing to remember: None of these property owners
met even the slightest blame for the situation! Who was and is trying to endure the deep, in the hope that it's really just a temporary low is not a new and permanent.
But what about those that need to just sell their property in this situation? Because lift such as the new economic situation, the total debt can not.
Where is here the government was so quick at hand, the bankers were to blame for their plight to "apologize"? Where is the help of these same government for the people is the plight of these are not to blame ?
No, No! Do not worry!
This is NOT a desperate call after the state!
Any citizen with a very little life experience knows that he is from the state, especially when need be, can not expect anything. When it comes to cashing the state is fast and efficient in the matter - but if the skewer is sometimes the other way you can see by our politicians only have one last dust cloud in a hasty departure.
"Sorry, I have another important appointment grad .........."
So what makes the experienced people in need ?
And that's what some of them have done so. People who are in the predicament faced by a not very salable separating Immobile have looked around and found in the idea of house lottery an ideal alternative to traditional disposal.
course became clear that thousands of times with a Hausverlosung more work is connected, as easy to hire a broker of the property sold but if not a choice but then no distance is too difficult to get to your destination.
And why not? The home draw is actually a "win-win" situation for all involved. In fact even the state!
Because
1) The seller / raffle not stumble into bankruptcy with all the associated unpleasant side effects.
2) The participants have fun are thousands of times higher in a game in which the odds simply because no profit-maximization is behind the idea. And to draw an even more refreshing than the photos on the Internet and brooding dream ....
And one is certainly so come to a property which he might otherwise never have afforded.
3) Banks have become get shaky loans repaid in full and there is a greater potential borrowers can offer a completely unencumbered property as collateral. (Namely the winner if he wants to make a portion of its profits to cash)
4) Services and lawyers get back into a business to do something that had collapsed with the collapse of the housing market as well.
5) A new industry could develop which in turn makes money, the unemployed off the streets and paying tax.
6) The State because who is not insolvent owner of the shoe but can be pleased that citizens simply helped themselves have taken even more to make to donations to are tax revenue from land management (etc) and the new line of business ...
Basically, everyone is happy!
.......... or could there are at least.
For in reality is not joy to see the state, the opposite! With brute force, a crowbar and (unfortunately, "once again"), the Justice on the march to all the above positive to drag in the dirt.
Why? Because a handful of lottery companies (rightly) afraid of your sales - and are committed to at times of high politics now than any of the needs of the people.
people who are resourceful and find a solution once, there are also a second time, and have just have a few stubborn from the ignorant "No" to the authorities: Do not be intimidated and continue to think, for gaps (aka the State) sought in the law, and are at the idea just does not fall Hausverlosung but instead a contest to host .
And because these people are fighters natures, just now they are fighting for the idea. Even petitions, the question at least the competition is to legalize clearly and explicitly. The really
legal contest that is to be prevented in some places by clever henchmen of the gambling lobby, with respect to the most absurd laws. (As it is even said to a bird who wants to stifle the fact by attempting a correlation with the Radio Act (?!??!)- produce.)
I personally believe that this "house-raffle operator" prove with this fight seemed both himself and the very idea of house lottery any favors. I think that pleased the politicians would legalize the lottery on condition that they be allowed to take with reference to this final track, the house raffle to the grave.
my opinion, the competition is really not a promising concept, because I the "average people" think it prudent enough to know that he quite simply having the knowledge to make it to the destination. Why, then, where you actually play out from the start know that you can not reach the goal?
The house lottery, everyone has the same chance at luck! No matter how educated or intelligent or whatever it is. But the lottery?
I think even for me a man with a very extensive and comprehensive education and yet there is so much knowledge that I just did not. If only one question relating to football - and I'm out. :-)
times but let's focus on the essence: the essence of the thing
that (a) of the property owners themselves the burden of the purchase, the installment payments, etc. worn. No one here has offered him a safety net. It is his property, he must have the right to dispose of such property as he pleases! Whether he lives, rent, leaves free to use, sold, given away, gives life annuity, sold ......... or just giving away!
And (b) have
that Germany, like the other 26 EU Member States, subject to first by their accession to the EU once ALL the "founding Treaty of Rome." All have 27 last year ratified the Treaty of Lisbon (EU Constitution, even if selected for conflict prevention a different title) and this has come with power in Europe 12/01/2009.
An essential core philosophy of the EU is that no citizen of a Member State may be worse off as a citizen of another Member State. Furthermore, in primary articles (28-48) set a clear, that the free movement of goods and services must be maintained between Member States. There is ample case law
now that the EU and the ECJ considered the possibility to participate in a game of chance as a service.
There is also no doubt that the various types of gambling in some Member States of the EU are legal and free. Austria, Spain, Malta, England, Cyprus ... to name a few. Some more, some less, with different conditions but it is LEGAL.
This doubt, the conclusion can be drawn that the rejection of the advertisements, an Austrian house lottery provider eg by a German media would like to commission clearly Europe illegality is! (And actionable as such would be!)
can It also concluded that the German gaming convention (including the one from hypocrisy hardly outdone, "argument" of this but serves only to protect the participants from the gambling ) simply Europe is moving right-retardant!
The Gambling Treaty contravenes European law. (And the EU has already put into effect before which was reported clear to Germany!)
Germany, but is (like all other EU members) that European law .... just as with any civil law applies: "Where no plaintiff - There is not a judge ")
And so it stays that way hasten German courts obey the policy to help (those who obediently policy protects the interests of the monopolists) One can say that 70 years after we have all hoped that it's over. that makes the law in Germany to the lackey of the policy, it is that time again!
German court rulings speak with full knowledge that those judgments are illegal
It will only proceed so clever that the military value to set high, that none of those who have so often been the grounds of financial hardship at all hot-button used to draw the solution back home, able is the chain of command to fund up to the ECJ. In order to achieve what is intended.
It is not even shy away from a Hausverloser spared, so a person that has come about not sigh in a non-self-inflicted fate has been active themselves but rather to solve the problem to criminalize. (I'm talking about Yes! Volker Stiny, which to me is almost always a hero!)
only to finally put to the clear
This is not about forcing the Hausverloser happy now people (!) want. Everyone should be allowed to decide themselves OB (!), And then at WHAT (!) Would like to attend matches it. It is in Reason for diversity - a diversity which is nunmal the essence of democracy. I've worked for - Just like the freedom - including freedom with my property! - I have to put up with hardships, so as to utilize my favorite. And when I look under the general (and again: NOT caused by me) wants to do to able to work a few thousand lots for sale instead of once an object, it must also be given this freedom.
And in line with what the EU provides and requires.
It could all be summed up very briefly said:
It is about the German policy to clearly call to reason and to remember that they too to abide by laws has. must
And if this policy to adopt hand the power law has ceded to Brussels, they are condemned themselves again just in future comply with these laws and not be where's would fit them better into the stuff fresh turn to do their own thing.
Because
1) The seller / raffle not stumble into bankruptcy with all the associated unpleasant side effects.
2) The participants have fun are thousands of times higher in a game in which the odds simply because no profit-maximization is behind the idea. And to draw an even more refreshing than the photos on the Internet and brooding dream ....
And one is certainly so come to a property which he might otherwise never have afforded.
3) Banks have become get shaky loans repaid in full and there is a greater potential borrowers can offer a completely unencumbered property as collateral. (Namely the winner if he wants to make a portion of its profits to cash)
4) Services and lawyers get back into a business to do something that had collapsed with the collapse of the housing market as well.
5) A new industry could develop which in turn makes money, the unemployed off the streets and paying tax.
6) The State because who is not insolvent owner of the shoe but can be pleased that citizens simply helped themselves have taken even more to make to donations to are tax revenue from land management (etc) and the new line of business ...
Basically, everyone is happy!
.......... or could there are at least.
For in reality is not joy to see the state, the opposite! With brute force, a crowbar and (unfortunately, "once again"), the Justice on the march to all the above positive to drag in the dirt.
Why? Because a handful of lottery companies (rightly) afraid of your sales - and are committed to at times of high politics now than any of the needs of the people.
people who are resourceful and find a solution once, there are also a second time, and have just have a few stubborn from the ignorant "No" to the authorities: Do not be intimidated and continue to think, for gaps (aka the State) sought in the law, and are at the idea just does not fall Hausverlosung but instead a contest to host .
And because these people are fighters natures, just now they are fighting for the idea. Even petitions, the question at least the competition is to legalize clearly and explicitly. The really
legal contest that is to be prevented in some places by clever henchmen of the gambling lobby, with respect to the most absurd laws. (As it is even said to a bird who wants to stifle the fact by attempting a correlation with the Radio Act (?!??!)- produce.)
I personally believe that this "house-raffle operator" prove with this fight seemed both himself and the very idea of house lottery any favors. I think that pleased the politicians would legalize the lottery on condition that they be allowed to take with reference to this final track, the house raffle to the grave.
my opinion, the competition is really not a promising concept, because I the "average people" think it prudent enough to know that he quite simply having the knowledge to make it to the destination. Why, then, where you actually play out from the start know that you can not reach the goal?
The house lottery, everyone has the same chance at luck! No matter how educated or intelligent or whatever it is. But the lottery?
I think even for me a man with a very extensive and comprehensive education and yet there is so much knowledge that I just did not. If only one question relating to football - and I'm out. :-)
times but let's focus on the essence: the essence of the thing
that (a) of the property owners themselves the burden of the purchase, the installment payments, etc. worn. No one here has offered him a safety net. It is his property, he must have the right to dispose of such property as he pleases! Whether he lives, rent, leaves free to use, sold, given away, gives life annuity, sold ......... or just giving away!
And (b) have
that Germany, like the other 26 EU Member States, subject to first by their accession to the EU once ALL the "founding Treaty of Rome." All have 27 last year ratified the Treaty of Lisbon (EU Constitution, even if selected for conflict prevention a different title) and this has come with power in Europe 12/01/2009.
An essential core philosophy of the EU is that no citizen of a Member State may be worse off as a citizen of another Member State. Furthermore, in primary articles (28-48) set a clear, that the free movement of goods and services must be maintained between Member States. There is ample case law
now that the EU and the ECJ considered the possibility to participate in a game of chance as a service.
There is also no doubt that the various types of gambling in some Member States of the EU are legal and free. Austria, Spain, Malta, England, Cyprus ... to name a few. Some more, some less, with different conditions but it is LEGAL.
This doubt, the conclusion can be drawn that the rejection of the advertisements, an Austrian house lottery provider eg by a German media would like to commission clearly Europe illegality is! (And actionable as such would be!)
can It also concluded that the German gaming convention (including the one from hypocrisy hardly outdone, "argument" of this but serves only to protect the participants from the gambling ) simply Europe is moving right-retardant!
The Gambling Treaty contravenes European law. (And the EU has already put into effect before which was reported clear to Germany!)
Germany, but is (like all other EU members) that European law .... just as with any civil law applies: "Where no plaintiff - There is not a judge ")
And so it stays that way hasten German courts obey the policy to help (those who obediently policy protects the interests of the monopolists) One can say that 70 years after we have all hoped that it's over. that makes the law in Germany to the lackey of the policy, it is that time again!
German court rulings speak with full knowledge that those judgments are illegal
It will only proceed so clever that the military value to set high, that none of those who have so often been the grounds of financial hardship at all hot-button used to draw the solution back home, able is the chain of command to fund up to the ECJ. In order to achieve what is intended.
It is not even shy away from a Hausverloser spared, so a person that has come about not sigh in a non-self-inflicted fate has been active themselves but rather to solve the problem to criminalize. (I'm talking about Yes! Volker Stiny, which to me is almost always a hero!)
only to finally put to the clear
This is not about forcing the Hausverloser happy now people (!) want. Everyone should be allowed to decide themselves OB (!), And then at WHAT (!) Would like to attend matches it. It is in Reason for diversity - a diversity which is nunmal the essence of democracy. I've worked for - Just like the freedom - including freedom with my property! - I have to put up with hardships, so as to utilize my favorite. And when I look under the general (and again: NOT caused by me) wants to do to able to work a few thousand lots for sale instead of once an object, it must also be given this freedom.
And in line with what the EU provides and requires.
It could all be summed up very briefly said:
It is about the German policy to clearly call to reason and to remember that they too to abide by laws has. must
And if this policy to adopt hand the power law has ceded to Brussels, they are condemned themselves again just in future comply with these laws and not be where's would fit them better into the stuff fresh turn to do their own thing.
0 comments:
Post a Comment